CHALLENGE YOUR OWN PERSPECTIVE
If you cannot recognize the inflexible designs your perception places you into, read this. Albert Einstein said that “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used [to] …create them.” What he did not say is that you need to be mentally and emotionally equipped to handle the transition.
To recognize a context without allowing its dictatorial rights from ruling us; from formulating a prescriptive action or channeling a perceptual habit or bias, frees us from the servitude of its necessity. So doing unbound perception from preselected tracks; and we can then recalibrate human potential and perception beyond its present limits
Who are we? We assume we are the socialized detailed; that experiential summary characterized and depicted through a linear narrative overburdened with contextual pageantry marking significant events and compiled into a designated avatar that looks and speaks like us. But we really don’t know who we are nor what we are capable of outside the Known.
Knowing as we practice it, is a temporal and dictatorial state fashioned, through linguistically defined patronage, creating a perceptual doctrine whose dynamism is indigenous to objects, words, contexts and the endless advocacy of drama we careen into as a matter of principle, belief or other.
Moreover, representation recognized and ascribed through linguistic terms, as a descriptive conveyance requiring empathic credence, shortchanges the necessary depth of perception for a complete and necessary sense of what we are dealing with. The unknown is not hidden from us; it is just that context and its narrated designs imposes a linear transaction which overwhelms the perceptual outline into a default setting focused on managing the world through contextual tools such as language, thinking and understanding.
Language, however, projects a contextual cognizance so convenient and effective, we forget we are merely using contextual tools at our disposal rather than to project overall awareness. This battle, fought at the tip of the spear, meant to pierce the assumptions of the norm, is exemplified through the Diamond Sutras, the Heart Sutras, Buddhist scriptures, Yana Yoga and other qualified texts and certain meta-physical pursuits.
LETS REFRAME THE CONVERSATION
We live a reality through the understanding of conforming to an assemblage, as whatever has us enrolled.
By defining ourselves through the catalogs of distinctions derived from the Known's (Matrix or Maya) approach to reality, we become servile and addicted to the practices and effects it promotes. Understanding is an expansive contract yet highly subservient to herding as an anthology of compatible and interdependent designs. The Known, as we see it, builds out of constructs and contexts delineated by language into coherence. Understanding is a protagonist to its own design, of its own measures, ad-hoc causes, and to results promoted as its own conveyances. And it ignores what does not "exist", a myopia outside the relevance of anthropomorphic justifications.
Awareness enlivens endless positions. Some positions are often advocated by contextual tenants, human beings who often presume what language prepositions in front of them as the only perception in existence. Humans taught to defend the attributes they recognize as their own, become the perceptual representation of how they see what they see. Some will even insert themselves onto others, so convinced are they of the position that holds them accountable to the version of reality they have taken on.
The use of language conditions perceptual intransigence, by emphasizing description as a trusted servant to an idealized informational transaction. Language is no trusted informant. Awareness beyond language description is. Most people forget it’s the intelligence and awareness behind language that makes us versatile linguistically. We live in a perceptual trap when we automatically think into a language-based awareness which is nothing but recognition of name and form.
Human intelligence is displayed through language and easily expands into insight, intuition, and awareness beyond comprehension. However, understanding, explanations, and thinking have finite repercussions as expressions of intelligence. These are functional tools of contextual dependence that sanction their relevance into a cohesive narrative, continuously practiced into a complicit synergism addicted to a Matrix of cognition saturate by Ergo
Buddhism is not about getting to the Void. Once you know that, you can discover the Void on its own term. Madness is the assumption that sanity is not coercing the intransigence of knowing into believing that coherence is not just an arbitrary arrangement. When crossing the boundaries of normal, you must be willing to range beyond assumptions, regardless of their sources. If nothing is what it seems, recognition is not an autonomous managerial tool from which to exercise perceptual self-reliance or Self enquiry. But it is a great tool that preserves perceptual collusion and allegiances. Recognition also creates compliant automatons good at regurgitating a past onto the future yet hardly versatile with poor adaptability skill sets.
AND MANY SCHOOLS DO WHAT EXACTLY?
This is a book about freedom but not the freedom purchased out of contextual obligations. That freedom is often a compelling exercise of contextual polarity. This book caters to Freedom beyond Comprehension outside of contextual imposition.
The Unknown is the absolute beyond all participants, participation, and the play which emerges from the comingling of the two. And yet that description merely serves an orientation from which we perceive what we describe, what cannot be described. Words cannot contrive an assemblage that might project from something that does not exist within those terms. Look, we are not perceptually autonomous. Once born, we are branded into contextual relevancy and hence only participate along the lines we recognize. Yet here is a paradox beyond our grasp.
WHO ARE WE?
​
We are “That”, the Freedom of uncharted potential. And yet that is not who we are. We are the undetermined prospects of enlightenment but not the image you entertain of what this means.